Organized by region and route type

Global server locations and routes

CeeVPN’s route directory covers 120+ countries / 160+ routes. This page lists representative cities, route types, and streaming compatibility, with guidance on choosing a path based on your destination, local network, and typical usage hours.

Unlimited devices 14-day no-questions-asked refund No email address required
COVERAGE 120+ countries

Coverage spans Asia-Pacific, North America, Europe, and other commonly used destinations.

ROUTES 160+ routes
DEVICES Unlimited
REFUND 14 days
Route directory

Browse representative routes by region

The table illustrates regional distribution and common path types; it does not mean each region has only one entry point. Available routes in the client depend on your subscription access. The streaming column indicates whether a route offers the relevant compatibility; playback also depends on the platform account region, licensing, device cache, and local network conditions.

IEPL: more controlled path Relay: connect first, then forward Direct: connect straight to the exit
Country or region City Route type Streaming support
Asia-Pacific
Hong Kong, China Hong Kong IEPL Supported; platform dependent
Japan Tokyo Direct Supported; test after connecting
Japan Osaka Relay Supported; platform dependent
Singapore Singapore Relay Supported; test after connecting
South Korea Seoul Direct Supported; platform dependent
Australia Sydney Relay Supported; test after connecting
North America
United States Los Angeles IEPL Supported; platform dependent
United States San Jose Relay Supported; test after connecting
United States Seattle Direct Supported; platform dependent
United States New York Relay Supported; test after connecting
Canada Vancouver Direct Supported; platform dependent
Canada Toronto Relay Supported; test after connecting
Europe
United Kingdom London Relay Supported; platform dependent
Germany Frankfurt Direct Supported; test after connecting
France Paris Relay Supported; platform dependent
Netherlands Amsterdam Direct Supported; test after connecting
Switzerland Zurich Relay Supported; platform dependent
Sweden Stockholm Direct Supported; test after connecting
Other regions
Brazil São Paulo Relay Supported; platform dependent
United Arab Emirates Dubai Relay Supported; test after connecting
South Africa Johannesburg Direct Supported; platform dependent
India Mumbai Relay Supported; test after connecting
Chile Santiago Direct Supported; platform dependent
Argentina Buenos Aires Relay Supported; test after connecting
Use the route table to narrow your options, not to replace real connection tests. Different access paths in the same city may use different carrier networks. Start with the target region, then test on your own network during your usual hours for more meaningful results.
Route architecture

Route types and path differences

IEPL, relay, and direct connections are not simple quality tiers. They represent different access methods, levels of path control, and resource costs. Choose by first confirming your destination, then considering your local carrier network, typical usage hours, and application needs.

IEPL

IEPL

IEPL places the cross-region link on a more controlled transmission path. Your device first connects to a designated entry point, then reaches the exit region through a relatively concentrated route. Compared with relying entirely on public-network routing, this approach prioritizes path consistency and suits long sessions, remote collaboration, large file transfers, and services sensitive to connection fluctuations.

Dedicated-route resources usually cost more to obtain and maintain, so they are not the right default for every situation. When the destination is nearby, a good direct connection may be simpler; if the local path to the IEPL entry point is poor, the access segment can still affect the experience. Treat IEPL as a path option, not a performance label detached from the surrounding network.

More concentrated path control Good for sustained sessions Higher resource cost
RELAY

Relay routes

A relay route sends device traffic to an access point first, then forwards it to the target exit. Its value is in breaking an unstable or unsuitable direct path into sections that are easier to manage. For cross-region access, content platforms, and work applications, relays can balance coverage and path quality.

A relay does not necessarily mean a shorter path. Extra forwarding adds scheduling overhead and consumes more resources, but it can avoid some poorly performing direct paths. When choosing a relay, match the target region first rather than focusing only on the entry city; the exit location and its relationship to the destination usually matter more.

Forwarded after access Flexible coverage options
DIRECT

Direct routes

A direct route connects the device straight to an exit in the target region, without an additional access-and-forwarding layer. Its structure is simpler and suits cases where the local path to the destination is already good. For nearby regions, short browsing sessions, message sync, and ordinary web requests, direct routes are usually worth testing first.

Direct performance depends more heavily on how the local carrier routes traffic across regions. The same route can perform differently on different networks and at different times, so its name alone is not enough to judge it. If direct access fluctuates during your usual hours, compare a relay or IEPL route in the same region.

Simple connection structure Depends on local routing
What to evaluate

Does the path match the destination?

When accessing a service in Japan, test a Japanese exit first; for North American services, start with a North American exit. Cross-region detours add distance and may cause content platforms to detect an unexpected region. A nearby-sounding city does not guarantee a suitable path—the service’s region is the starting point.

What to evaluate

Is it stable during your usual hours?

A smooth short connection only shows that it worked at that moment. Remote work, sustained viewing, and file sync should be tested during real usage hours, checking page loads, session persistence, and continuous transfers. Do not lock in a route long term based on one quick test.

What to evaluate

Does the application require a fixed region?

Some content services, AI tools, and enterprise systems provide different features based on the exit region. Confirm the required region first, then compare route types within it. Frequent regional switching may trigger an application’s own security checks, so keep the exit relatively consistent for longer tasks.

Selection guide

Choose routes by use case: selection tips

No single route suits every application. Everyday browsing prioritizes responsiveness and compatibility; streaming needs sustained transfers and regional compatibility; AI tools need stable sessions; gaming is sensitive to path changes; office work needs persistent connections and continuity. Splitting routes by use case is more practical than staying on one route permanently.

BROWSE

Everyday browsing and international websites

Web pages, research, social apps, and message sync usually consist of many short requests. Start with a nearby direct route to avoid unnecessary distance; if page-load times vary noticeably during your usual hours, switch to a relay in the same region. Browsing does not require the costliest path from the outset—reliably completing requests matters more than the route label.

If websites perform very differently, check each site’s region and your local network rather than attributing one site’s issue to the entire route. Clearing the app cache or reconnecting before testing again can also reduce interference from old sessions and regional data.

MEDIA

Streaming and sustained viewing

For streaming, match the content region first and consider route type second. Choose an exit marked as compatible with the platform, open the content page to confirm regional detection, then start continuous playback. If playback starts normally but buffers repeatedly, compare a relay and an IEPL route within the same region. Changing both region and route type at once makes the cause difficult to identify.

Content platforms determine available content using licensing, account details, device cache, and exit region, so “supported” means the route offers the relevant compatibility—not that every account sees the same catalog. After changing routes, reopen the app so it can recognize the new connection state correctly.

AI

AI tools and long sessions

AI tools often involve continuous output, file uploads, and long sessions. Prefer a relay or IEPL route in the service’s usual region, and confirm that sign-in, conversations, and uploads all work before starting an important task. Testing only whether the home page opens does not cover connection persistence or data transfer during generation.

For longer tasks, keep the exit region consistent where possible. Switching routes repeatedly mid-task re-establishes the connection and may trigger the service’s own session checks. If the current path is stable, continuing with it is usually more reliable than chasing different names in the route list.

GAME

Gaming and real-time interaction

Gaming is more sensitive to path changes. Confirm the game server’s region first, then test from a nearby exit. Direct connections have a simpler structure and suit cases where the local path to the destination is good; if matches feel inconsistent or the connection state keeps changing, try a relay or IEPL route in the same region. Do not judge match quality solely by launcher download speed—the servers and traffic patterns may differ.

Test during a real match and your usual hours, while avoiding large background syncs. If several apps share the same connection, background transfers can also affect real-time interaction. Testing the game separately from download tasks makes the suitable route easier to identify.

WORK

Remote work and file transfers

Work setups often combine meetings, enterprise systems, code hosting, and file sync, so connection continuity is the priority. Test an IEPL or relay route in the enterprise system’s region first, completing the full flow from sign-in and uploads to joining meetings. Opening only the login page does not show whether later persistent connections and transfers will remain stable.

Avoid switching exits frequently once an important task has started. If an enterprise system requires access from a consistent region, keep the route region unchanged throughout the task. CeeVPN supports Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, and Linux; sign in on each device to get the client and subscription. Devices are unlimited, but connections should still be arranged sensibly for the actual use case.

Regional coverage

Coverage regions and selection order

CeeVPN covers 120+ countries / 160+ routes. Regional coverage is not just about making the list longer; it preserves alternative paths for different destinations. When performance changes, switch route types within the same region first, then consider a nearby region.

NORTH AMERICA

North America

Suitable for content platforms, AI tools, and enterprise services in the United States and Canada. Choose a western or eastern city based on the service’s target area rather than selecting only by country and overlooking the actual traffic direction.

Western United States Eastern United States Western Canada Eastern Canada
EUROPE

Europe

Coverage includes the United Kingdom, Germany, France, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and commonly used Northern European locations. For access across Europe, consider the destination country, account region, and exit location together rather than defaulting to a geographically central city.

United Kingdom Germany France Netherlands Switzerland
OTHER REGIONS

Other regions

Routes in South America, the Middle East, Africa, and South Asia serve specific regional access needs. Long-distance connections require closer attention to destination matching and sustained testing; when a service has no strict regional requirement, nearby alternatives are also worth comparing.

South America Middle East Africa South Asia
Operating notes

How to evaluate route performance

Route selection is not a one-time setup. Carrier networks, destination services, and device conditions all affect the result. A consistent troubleshooting order reduces unnecessary switching and makes it easier to identify where an issue occurs.

TARGET

Confirm the target region first

Identify the destination’s region and the exit region required by the account. Content platforms focus on licensing regions; AI tools and enterprise systems may depend on service availability; games should match the server region. Without a clear target, switching blindly only makes diagnosis harder.

PATH

Compare paths within the same region

Within one exit region, compare direct, relay, and IEPL routes in sequence. This keeps the regional variable fixed and shows how route type affects the connection. Changing both region and route type at once makes the difference impossible to attribute.

VERIFY

Validate with a real task

For browsing, open your regular websites; for streaming, confirm regional recognition and continuous playback; for AI tools, test conversations and uploads; for work, verify meetings and file sync. Route suitability should be judged by a complete task, not a single page load.

RETAIN

Keep a working backup

After finding a suitable route, note one backup in the same region. If the local network changes or the destination service behaves differently, switch to that alternative before trying another region. A same-region backup makes it easier to preserve the account and content environment.

CeeVPN ROUTES

Choose global routes by destination

Choose the target region first, compare route types next, and validate with a real task. Sign in to the user panel to get the client and subscription.

Start Free